The recent NJ case of Oyebola v. Wal-Mart Stores puts a finer point on the “ongoing snow storm” argument, which greatly reduces property owner’s and contractor’s duty to remove snow during an ongoing storm. In Oyebola, the plaintiff slipped in a Wal-Mart parking lot during an active snow storm. The defendants moved for summary judgment based on the fact that the storm was ongoing when the plaintiff was walking in the parking lot, and that the snow removal contractor was on site performing services at the time of plaintiff’s incident. The defendants’ motions were granted and in affirming the trial court’s decision, the Appellate Division reasoned that the property owner and snow removal contractor are afforded a reasonable amount of time to remove snow when a storm is ongoing. The decision builds on an ever-growing collection of cases related to ongoing storms that provide relief from the seemingly strict duty imposed on defendants for slip and falls on snow and ice.
Thompson Becker, LLC provides a wide range of both transactional and litigation services for the construction related professionals and their businesses. We have successfully prosecuted and defended various types of construction related claims. Contact us at (856) 616-8886 to see how we can help you with your construction law needs.
The information in this blog post (“post”) is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction. No information contained in this post should be construed as legal advice from Thompson Becker, LLC or the individual author, nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter. No reader of this post should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible through, this post without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer licensed in the recipient’s state, country or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction.